SAVE OU SPORTS.ORG


GO BOBCATS!

EMBEZZLEMENT IN OU'S DEPARTMENT OF INTERCOLLEGIATE ATHLETICS

JOIN EQUITY IN ATHLETICS.ORG - GREAT LAKES CHAPTER - INCLUDES OHIO AND MICHIGAN

Link to Our Petition - Please Sign - Thank You to All Who Have Already Signed

Save Ohio Lacrosse   Save Ohio Swimming and Diving and Save Ohio Swimming   Bringing Back Ohio Track

United Swim Parents' Letters to OU's President & Athletic Director   NCAA Takes Notice   Recent Site Updates


 

LINKS


Home
Up
In Memoriam
What's the Buzz?
Embezzlement in Athletic Department
OU Sports Financials 2005-2006
Equity in Athletics - Great Lakes Chapter
Big Collegiate Sports vs All Other Sports
Reporting Suspected Violations
Title IX Information
AD Boeh: OU Compliant with Title IX
Unanswered Letters
Important Info for Athletes
Rallies and Other Actions
We're Organized - Join Us!
HELP US TAKE ACTION!
$277,550 Over Budget Spent In Mobile
VA Legislators Angry
The Issues
Developments
Reactions
Articles and News Reports
Who are these dropped athletes?
Class, Dignity & Competitive Spirit
Lacrosse
Swimming & Diving
Track & Field
"Vision Ohio"
Reinstatement Success Stories
Parallel Efforts at Other Universities
Resources
OU Compliance
Links


PETITION
 
Please sign our petition to save dropped OU sports.  Click here.  If your current circumstances or position with Ohio University do not require anonymity, we request that you sign with your name  rather than as "Anonymous" as some have.  Thank you and thanks to the Women's Lacrosse blog for setting up this petition.

MORE LINKS
 
Bobcat Attack Message Board
 
Ohio University Alumni Association
 
OU Students have an active discussion going on in FaceBook.Com.  Click here to go to FaceBook.Com and join in.
 
OU Student Newspaper "The Post Online"
 
www.EquityinAthletics.org
 
Save James Madison University Sports.org
 
Taking Inside Higher Ed to the Mat

EMAIL CONTACT FOR THIS SITE:  SaveOUSports ATgmailDOTcom

 

FROM THE OFFICE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS OF THE US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCTION


Further Clarification of Intercollegiate Athletics Policy Guidance Regarding Title IX Compliance

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
OFFICE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS

400 MARYLAND AVE., S.W.
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20202-1100

THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY

July 11, 2003

Dear Colleague:

It is my pleasure to provide you with this Further Clarification of Intercollegiate Athletics Policy Guidance Regarding Title IX Compliance.

Since its enactment in 1972, Title IX has produced significant advancement in athletic opportunities for women and girls across the nation. Recognizing that more remains to be done, the Bush Administration is firmly committed to building on this legacy and continuing the progress that Title IX has brought toward true equality of opportunity for male and female student-athletes in America.

In response to numerous requests for additional guidance on the Department of Education's (Department) enforcement standards since its last written guidance on Title IX in 1996, the Department' s Office for Civil Rights (OCR) began looking into whether additional guidance on Title IX requirements regarding intercollegiate athletics was needed. On June 27, 2002, Secretary of Education Rod Paige created the Secretary's Commission on Opportunities in Athletics to investigate this matter further, and to report back with recommendations on how to improve the application of the current standards for measuring equal opportunity to participate in athletics under Title IX. On February 26, 2003, the Commission presented Secretary Paige with its final report, "Open to All: Title IX at Thirty," and in addition, individual members expressed their views.

After eight months of discussion and an extensive and inclusive fact-finding process, the Commission found very broad support throughout the country for the goals and spirit of Title IX. With that in mind, OCR today issues this Further Clarification in order to strengthen Title IX's promise of non-discrimination in the athletic programs of our nation’s schools.

Title IX establishes that: "No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be
excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance."

In its 1979 Policy Interpretation, the Department established a three-prong test for compliance with Title IX, which it later amplified and clarified in its 1996 Clarification. The test provides that an institution is in compliance if 1) the intercollegiate- level participation opportunities for male and female students at the institution are "substantially proportionate" to their respective full- time undergraduate enrollments, 2) the institution has a "history and continuing practice of program expansion" for the underrepresented sex, or 3) the institution is "fully and effectively" accommodating the interests and abilities of the underrepresented sex.

First, with respect to the three-prong test, which has worked well, OCR encourages schools to take advantage of its flexibility, and to consider which of the three prongs best suits their individual situations. All three prongs have been used successfully by schools to comply with Title IX, and the test offers three separate ways of assessing whether schools are providing equal opportunities to their male and female students to participate in athletics. If a school does not satisfy the "substantial proportionality" prong, it would still satisfy the three-prong test if it maintains a history and continuing practice of program expansion for the underrepresented sex, or if "the interests and abilities of the members of [the underrepresented] sex have been fully and effectively accommodated by the present program." Each of the three prongs is thus a valid, alternative way for schools to comply with Title IX.

The transmittal letter accompanying the 1996 Clarification issued by the Department described only one of these three separate prongs - substantial proportionality - as a "safe harbor" for Title IX compliance. This led many schools to believe, erroneously, that they must take measures to ensure strict proportionality between the sexes. In fact, each of the three prongs of the test is an equally sufficient means of complying with Title IX, and no one prong is favored. The Department will continue to make clear, as it did in its 1996 Clarification, that “[i]nstitutions have flexibility in providing nondiscriminatory participation opportunities to their students, and OCR does not require quotas.”

In order to ensure that schools have a clear understanding of their options for compliance with Title IX, OCR will undertake an education campaign to help educational institutions appreciate the flexibility of the law, to explain that each prong of the test is a viable and separate means of compliance, to give practical examples of the ways in which schools can comply, and to provide schools with technical assistance as they try to comply with Title IX.

In the 1996 Clarification, the Department provided schools with a broad range of specific factors, as well as illustrative examples, to help schools understand the flexibility of the three-prong test. OCR reincorporates those factors, as well as those illustrative examples, into this Further Clarification, and OCR will continue to assist schools on a case-by-case basis and address any questions they have about Title IX compliance. Indeed, OCR encourages schools to request individualized assistance from OCR as they consider ways to meet the requirements of Title IX. As OCR works with schools on Title IX compliance, OCR will share information on successful approaches with the broader scholastic community.

Second, OCR hereby clarifies that nothing in Title IX requires the cutting or reduction of teams in order to demonstrate compliance with Title IX, and that the elimination of teams is a disfavored practice. Because the elimination of teams diminishes opportunities for students who are interested in participating in athletics instead of enhancing opportunities for students who have suffered from discrimination, it is contrary to the spirit of Title IX for the government to require or encourage an institution to eliminate athletic teams.

Therefore, in negotiating compliance agreements, OCR's policy will be to seek remedies that do not involve the elimination of teams.

Third, OCR hereby advises schools that it will aggressively enforce Title IX standards, including implementing sanctions for institutions that do not comply. At the same time, OCR will also work with schools to assist them in avoiding such sanctions by achieving Title IX compliance.

Fourth, private sponsorship of athletic teams will continue to be allowed. Of course, private sponsorship does not in any way change or diminish a school's obligations under Title IX.

Finally, OCR recognizes that schools will benefit from clear and consistent implementation of Title IX. Accordingly, OCR will ensure that its enforcement practices do not vary from region to region.

OCR recognizes that the question of how to comply with Title IX and to provide equal athletic opportunities for all students is a challenge for many academic institutions. But OCR believes that the three-prong test has provided, and will continue to provide, schools with the flexibility to provide greater athletic opportunities for students of both sexes.

OCR is strongly reaffirming today its commitment to equal opportunity for girls and boys, women and men. To that end, OCR is committed to continuing to work in partnership with educational institutions to ensure that the promise of Title IX becomes a reality for all students.

Thank you for your continuing interest in this subject.

Sincerely,

Gerald Reynolds
Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights


DROPPED TEAMS


 

wpe25.jpg (36227 bytes)

2006 Women's Lacrosse Team

 

 Women's Save Ohio Lacrosse Blog

 

LaxPower.com message board discussion on OU LAX

 

Women's Lacrosse web page at OU website

 


Swim Dive Team.jpg (90284 bytes)

Swimming and Diving

 

Save Ohio Swimming and Diving

and

Save Ohio Swimming

 

Swimming and Diving web page at OU website

 

Save Ohio University Swimming Discussion Forum


2005-2006 Track.jpg (20602 bytes)

Track and Field

 

Bringing Back Ohio Track Blog

 

Track and Field web page at OU website

 

YouTube video put together for the Track and Field Team


 

 

Home ] Up ]

Copyright 2007 - 2008 by SaveOUSports.org - Email:  SaveOUSports AT gmail DOT com 
SaveOUsports.org is a non-profit group devoted to action that will reinstate discontinued varsity sports at Ohio University.